6819 Indianapolis Blvd.
Hammond, IN 46324
(219) 845-5008 Fax (219) 845-5032
Email: info@calproject.org


Confined Disposal Facility (CDF) in East Chicago, Indiana

This site was last updated on January 21, 2003.  

For contact information:  Citizens for a Clean Environment.

For quick access to ACTUAL AIR MONITORING DATA click here.

 

MEDIAN AIR MONITORING DATA (CDF-2)

    The CDF (read TOXIC WASTE DUMP) is a project by the Army Corps of Engineers and the East Chicago Water Management Board.  The ostensible reason for the CDF is that the Army Corps plans to dredge Indiana Harbor and Ship Canal--the single most polluted site on the entire Great Lakes System--so as to keep all the sediments from continuing to pollute Lake Michigan, and then they will transfer the dredged sediments into the CDF, which the Army Corps will construct.

It sounds noble and that it would be a major environmental cleanup.

In reality, it is an environmental disaster.  

Before discussing the impact of the Project on the city of East Chicago, Indiana, however, it is necessary to talk about the environmental racism embodied in this Project:  this Project disproportionately effects people of color who overwhelmingly comprise the population of the city.  

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA OF THE POPULATION:  East Chicago is a city whose population is overwhelmingly people of color.  According to the 2000 US Census, of the 32,414 people living in East Chicago:

  • 16,728 (51.6%) are Latino
  • 11,405 (35.2%) are African-American
  • 349 (1.1%) are other people of color
  • 3,922 (12.1%) are white

Total percentage of population in East Chicago that are people of color:  87.9%.

As you read the following information, please keep the demographic information presented above in your mind.

THE CDF:  The planned site for the CDF is within 800 yards of two schools, East Chicago Central High School and Westside Junior High School!  The Army and the Water Management Board have decided to locate the CDF on a brownfield site, which is an unremediated site that was formerly an Atlantic Richfield oil refinery.  The Army's own air monitoring data shows--even before building has commenced!--that this site is currently spewing KNOWN CARCINOGENS (cancer-causing agents) into the air, and which is being detected at ABOVE ACCEPTABLE LIMITS at Central High.  (They are not even monitoring the air at Westside Jr. High, and while there is almost no mention of the nearby location of Central High in any of their planning/project documents, there is no mention at all of Westside!) 

The Army's complete report--so you can see the original data--can be accessed at: http://www.lrc.usace.army.mil/topics/IHC/Eci-Site/Air-Mon-Report02.htm.  Hazardous chemical findings at the East Chicago High School air monitoring site--extracted from the Army's own data--have been selected and are reported below.

SPECIFIC FINDINGS from the linked US Army Corps of Engineers' Air Monitoring Data:

Chemical (common name in bold; class of chemical in plain type)

Health Effects (Recognized Effects in bold)

Reporting Limit

Median amount (i.e., mid-range of all reports:  half are lower, half are higher) detected at East Chicago High School Between November 2001-July 2002

Benzene (a volatile organic compound or VOC) Recognized Carcinogen, Recognized Developmental Toxicant, & Recognized Reproductive Toxicant .20 ppb (parts per billion) .28 ppb
Toluene (VOC) Recognized Developmental Toxicant .30 ppb .44 ppb
m-Xylene & p-Xylene (VOC) Suspected Cardiovascular or Blood Toxicant; Suspected Developmental Toxicant; Suspected Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant; Suspected Immunotoxicant; Suspected Kidney Toxicant; Suspected Neurotoxicant; Suspected Reproductive Toxicant; Suspected Respiratory Toxicant; Suspected Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant. .50 ppb .51 ppb
Fluorene (a polyaromatic hydrocarbon or PAH) Suspected Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant 1.2 - 4.6 (ng/scm) 4.03
Naphthalene (PAH) Recognized Carcinogen; Suspected Cardiovascular or Blood Toxicant; Suspected Developmental Toxicant; Suspected Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant; Suspected Kidney Toxicant; Suspected Neurotoxicant; Suspected Respiratory Toxicant; Suspected Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant 4.5 - 9.1 (ng/scm) 57.20
Phenanthrene (PAH) Suspected Respiratory Toxicant; Suspected Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant 1.2 - 4.6 (ng/scm) 7.19
PCBs (Polychlorinated Biphenyls) Recognized Carcinogen; Recognized Developmental Toxicant; Suspected Endocrine Toxicant; Suspected Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant; Suspected Immunotoxicant; Suspected Neurotoxicant; Suspected Reproductive Toxicant; Suspected Respiratory Toxicant; Suspected Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant PCB 8: 2.25-4.56 pg/scm

 

PCB 18: 2.25-4.56 pg/scm

 

PCB 28: 2.25-4.56 pg/scm

 

PCB 31: 2.25-4.46 pg/scm

 

15.55

 

9.20

 

 

5.90

 

6.36

 

 

Barium (Metal) Suspected Developmental Toxicant; Suspected Neurotoxicant; Suspected Respiratory Toxicant .55 - .82 ng/scm 23.00
Chromium (Metal) Suspected Carcinogen; Suspected Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant; Suspected Kidney Toxicant; Suspected Respiratory Toxicant; Suspected Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant 1.1 - 1.6 ng/scm 2.5
Lead (Metal) Recognized Carcinogen; Recognized Developmental Toxicant; Recognized Reproductive Toxicant; Suspected Cardiovascular or Blood Toxicant; Suspected Endocrine Toxicant; Suspected  Gastrointestinal or Liver Toxicant; Suspected Immunotoxicant; Suspected Kidney Toxicant; Suspected Neurotoxicant; Suspected Respiratory Toxicant; Suspected Skin or Sense Organ Toxicant .55 - .82 ng/scm 7.8

Sources:  The chemicals chosen were found to have reached the threshold ("reporting limit") by which they could be measured in a laboratory, and were each reported at East Chicago Central High School--thus they are only a portion of the Army's complete data report.  Measurements included here were reported by the Army Corps of Engineers Air Monitoring Program at the East Chicago (IN) High School air monitoring site.  

Reaching this threshold, however, does not mean that it is necessarily dangerous to human health, as was suggested prior to January 21, 2003:  danger depends on a number of factors, such as specific chemical, amount of exposure, type of exposure (through breathing, drinking, eating, skin contact, etc.)  That being said, however, The Calumet Project believes that any reading above the reporting limit should be of serious concern, and should be investigated for possible effects on human health by professional chemists, toxicologists and epidemiologistsThis warning is intensified for those data that are multiples of the high end of the reporting limit:  see especially  PCB-8 (3+ times over reporting limit), naphthalene (6+ times), lead (+9 times), and barium (23+ times),

The complete data set, from which these data were extracted, can be accessed by hitting the link immediately above this table; selected data was chosen by Kim Scipes (Executive Director of The Calumet Project) on December 12, 2002.

VOC, PAH and PCB data collected from November 2001-July 2002.

Total Suspended Particulates of the Metals based on data collected from April 2002-July 2002.

Health Effects data was NOT provided by the US Army Corps of Engineers nor the East Chicago Water Management Board--in fact, they don't seem eager for this material to get out to the public.  However, this material was included in (and taken from) US PIRG (Public Information Research Group) Education Fund's excellent report of October 17, 2002:  IN GROSS VIOLATION:  HOW POLLUTERS ARE FLOODING AMERICA'S WATERWAYS WITH TOXIC CHEMICALS.  This entire report (covering the entire United States and Puerto Rico) can be found at:  http://www.uspirg.org/uspirg.asp?id2=8258&id3=USPIRG&.


In addition to the threat to the public health suggested above, there are a few other problems with this project, and information concerning this project will continue being updated and expanded over time, so you should check back periodically to discover the latest developments:

(1) The dredging will NOT clean up all of the sediments in the Harbor and Ship Canal, as the Army only plans to dredge down to navigable depths, not down to the clean sand which is needed.  In other words, current plans will dredge some material and remove it, but much will remain and it will be stirred up POLLUTING LAKE MICHIGAN WORSE THAN IF THE SENTIMENTS WERE LEFT IN PLACE.

(2) The Army wants to use a mechanical dredging method that is far inferior to a hydraulic method, meaning that as those sediments that are being removed are removed, they will be spread around, again, into the Lake.

(3)  The CDF is supposed to be built on this unremediated brownfield site that used to be an oil refinery, and which has never been cleaned up.  The Army has no idea of what is in that ground.  At a November 21, 2002 meeting of the East Chicago Water Management Board, the Army reported that they had been carrying out trenching around the proposed CDF site so as to try to determine what is in that ground.  After trenching around three-quarters of the site--they did not report the width of the trench, but they said they were going down 15 feet--the Army reported that they had found over 1200 different pipes of all different widths and lengths, and that they had no idea of what was in each one.  Accordingly, workers have to take precautions with each pipe they open.  They still found at least two pipes with toxic materials contained within.  In response to a question, the Army admitted they had not told the school administrations that they had found hazardous materials at the site, and it's questionable that any evacuation plan has been developed should such be necessary.

(4)  The proposed CDF is so large that it will hold an amount equivalent to that of FIVE WRIGLEY FIELDS (!), and it is not expected to be closed for 30 years!

(5)  The plan is an economic boondoggle.  The total cost of the Project--dredging and construction/maintenance of the CDF itself is projected to be $116,100,000.  According to the contract between the Army Corps of Engineers and the East Chicago Waterway Management Board (WMB), the WMB must pay 25% of all direct dredging and construction costs, and 100% of any costs other than direct costs.  However, 25% of $116 million is $29 million.  (This is in a city where the School Board is having to come up with $21 million just to keep the schools operating.)  In the contract, the WMB's financial contribution to the Project is $47,300,000.

 

For more information and/or to get involved fighting this project, please contact:

Citizens for a Clean Environment
% Betty Balanoff
1447 Michigan
Hammond, IN 46320
 
Tel:  219/931-9791
E-mail:  cj1972@rocketmail.com

 

CDF-1: Confined Disposal Facility CDF-5: Newspaper Links
CDF-2:  Median Air Monitoring Data CDF-6: News Update
CDF-3:  Actual Air Monitoring Data CDF-7: Votes against CDF in EC Mayoral Election
CDF-4: Letter to Officials re CDF CDF-8: Air monitoring update, 9-16-03
Army Corps Property Value Impact Study 2002 Assessment of Sediments in the Indiana Harbor AOC
Cancer Risks Polycyclic Organic Matter CDF Web Page Jan 2003
Citizens Questions & Concerns 2003 Corrosion Protection
Dredging Activity Information Session April 2001 Environmental Justice Analysis of Impact on Property Value
Environmental Releases for Lake County EPA Regulated Facilities in Lake County IN
Greenpeace - Technical Criteria for POP's Destruction Health Effects Pollution Locator
In Situ Treatment of Contaminated Sediments Indiana Harbor and Canal Maintenance Dredging Reg Req Rpt
Indiana Toxic Air Data 1997 Residents Protest Hazardous Waste Dump
Resoulution Opposing IH Ship Canal Dredging Review for short Henrickson Report
Review of Environmental Impact Statements Jan 2000 Risk Assessment Reviewpdf
Supplementary Risk Assessment Review Technologies for the destruction of PCB's
TOSC Conaminated Sediments TOSC Report Jan 2003
White Paper on the Husdson River PCB Cleanup 1994